Aceromex Design System

OVERVIEW

Aceromex is a company working in the steel industry in Mexico. With a wide range of products and services, they cater to clients in construction, manufacturing, and infrastructure. Their team is large, distributed across multiple regions, and relies heavily on digital tools both internally and externally.

ROLE

Visual Design

June 2025 - Current

Problem

When they reached out, their website was live but lacked visual consistency. Internally, different teams were using different styles and patterns when building tools for their intranet.

As a part of the company rebranding, my job was to design a unified design system that would serve both environments. This is the first stage of this project.

Goal

The main goals of this project were to:

  • Bring visual and functional consistency to both the public site and internal platforms.

  • Define a reusable system of components that could scale over time.

  • Improve collaboration between designers and developers with clear UI rules.

  • Create documentation that allowed non designers (PMs, marketers) to use components confidently.

The Research

I started by doing a deep dive into Aceromex's live website. The first part of this research was just auditing and documenting everything that already existed visually and functionally. No reinventing the wheel, just understanding what they had.

What I did:

  • Explored and mapped the UI patterns used across their pages.

  • Identified inconsistencies in buttons, font sizes, icon styles, layout spacing, etc.

  • Created a comprehensive inventory of components being used.

  • Analyzed the user flows and how navigation behaved across devices.

This initial audit helped me create a full list of design elements in Notion to normalize, group, and systematize later. Everything from icons to floating cards to chat widgets made it onto the list.

Once the inventory was done, I organized the design system into clear categories. I built it using a modular approach, starting with atomic components and moving into more complex combinations.

  • Atomic Components: buttons, links, icons, inputs, headings, etc.

  • Composite Components: cards, dropdowns, chat box, modals, tables, etc.

  • Navigation Components: navbars, sidebars, breadcrumbs, arrows

  • Feedback Components: toasts, loaders, confirmations

  • Layout Rules: spacing scale, grid, elevation, shadow, border radius

  • Typography System: type scale, line heights, usage guidelines

  • Iconography: a consistent set of system and brand icons

  • States & Variants: all components include hover, focus, disabled, and error states where needed.

Designing the elements

Since I had a clear list of components to build, I started with the simplest elements and worked my way up to more complex compositions. The first step was to define and standardize the design tokens to ensure consistency across the system.

My first approach was to start building directly from the audit and component list I had created. I kept the visuals clean and uncluttered, as the client emphasized the need for a clear, simple interface aligned with their new brand identity. However, as I progressed, I realized the initial list wasn’t complete. Some states, variations, and elements were missing and had to be added along the way.

The components were designed with simplicity in mind, clean shapes, clear labels, and plenty of space to keep everything easy to read. A bold blue is used across the system to create consistency and guide attention. The result is a clean, flexible set of elements ready to work across both the website and intranet.

Anterior
Anterior

LearnLy

Siguiente
Siguiente

Proyecto cuatro